It is indeed a sad commentary on sport to have witnessed the external elements that combined to affect the outcome of a match. I refer to the Canada-U.S. soccer semi-final played with great intensity and skill by both sides.
Unfortunately, as witnessed in many contests, the official fails to let the contest play on, particularly when the transgression is unintended or has no possible influence on the outcome. This is true in all matches, but particularly in one that is crucial to both teams and one that is being played with great skill on both sides.
The world watching, including the winning coach, witnessed and acknowledged a lack of good judgment and a quick whistle by the referee in a crucial match.
Christine Sinclair, the Canadian captain, expressed her concerns about a set of bad calls and now she is at the centre of an investigation for her post-game remarks.
So by what standards is she to be judged? Olympic standards? What are they? How do you square Christine's comments with the American opponent who gladly and without regard to the Olympic spirit knowingly took a corner kick she knew was not properly awarded?
Absent standards, which one would you choose? I chose Christine -- at least she was honest.
Ian Stewart
Victoria
